Nº 01 — Swiss Law Firms
AI solution for Swiss law firms
Swiss Knowledge Hub searches case files, case law, and contracts with source citations — on Swiss infrastructure, with no training use, and with role-based access per matter so that attorney-client privilege is supported technically.
Typical industry challenges
- Case-law and doctrinal research are scattered across multiple tools and paper extracts
- Client files live in yearly folders and are only partially accessible via full-text search
- Contract drafts are repeatedly written from similar templates with no systematic reuse
- Public-cloud AI tools are hard to reconcile with attorney-client privilege
- Know-how from older matters stays with individual partners rather than the firm's knowledge base
Concrete scenarios
How Swiss Knowledge Hub is used in day-to-day work — factual, citable, with sources.
Search case history
Lawyers ask about precedents, settlements, or strategies from earlier matters. Answers cite the relevant dossier with a page number — strictly within the matter's permissions.
Compare contracts and review clauses
Multiple contract versions or standard clauses can be placed side by side. The AI highlights differences and cites the references in the original documents.
Client-document Q&A
Matter-specific Q&A across incoming correspondence, expert opinions, and evidence. Every answer links the source document; access is restricted to the relevant matter.
Drafting support
Summaries, key arguments, and outline suggestions based on the firm's existing documents — as a starting point for legal work, not a replacement.
Compliance anchors for Swiss Law Firms
Regulatory reference points that typically come up in conversations with compliance, legal, or supervisors. Not legal advice — case-by-case assessment stays with the organization.
- Attorney-client privilege under Art. 321 of the Swiss Criminal Code
- Federal Act on the Free Movement of Lawyers (BGFA)
- Professional confidentiality under the SAV/FSA rules of conduct
- Revised Federal Act on Data Protection (revFADP)
- Matter-specific confidentiality agreements
LLM-specific requirements
- Attorney-client privilege and model training — under SKH default models there is no training on matter data by contract; under BYOK, provider terms apply
- Workspace and page separation as a technical safeguard for clean per-matter role modeling
- No transmission to public-cloud LLMs without an explicit decision by the firm
- Traceability of data flows through the chronological per-tenant audit log
Matching integrations
From the SKH integration catalog — chosen for this industry's requirements. The full list of sources, vector databases, and infrastructure services lives in the integrations section on the home page.
Frequent questions from this industry
Is the solution compatible with attorney-client privilege?
How is it ensured that matters do not get mixed up?
Can we easily import historical files?
Is our matter data used for model training?
What does the access record look like?
Further reading
Discuss the use case for Swiss Law Firms
15 minutes, industry-specific, no commitment. We will show the platform with a comparable scenario and answer compliance questions on the call.